TRAE YOUNG
CR RANK#22
STAR
GUARD · #11
ATL
TRAE
YOUNG
A generational scoring talent with elite footwork and an unstoppable mid-range pull-up. The most difficult player to guard one-on-one in the NBA — and the engine of OKC's dynasty-in-the-making.
32.4
PPG
5.5
RPG
6.6
APG
64.2
TS%
30.8
PER
+10.3
BPM
COURTSIDE RATING
75.8
CR SCORE
TOP 10 LEAGUE-WIDE
6'6"
HEIGHT
195
WEIGHT
27
AGE
KENTUCKY
COLLEGE
2018
DRAFT YEAR
11TH
DRAFT PICK
76
GP
34.1
MPG

STAT PROFILE

TY STAT PROFILE

Percentiles measured against all NBA guards — 2024–25 season
OFFENSIVE
DEFENSIVE

ADVANCED METRICS

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Most stats sourced from basketball-reference.com
CORE OVERVIEW
YEARGMPGBPMBPM+PPGRPGAPGSPGBPGTOPGTS%2P%3P%FT%
'25 GATL76
34.188
8.498
+6.2
32.799
5.562
6.681
1.888
0.944
2.471
64.2%91
53.7%84
38.2%67
87.4%82
OFFENSIVE STATS
YEAROBPMOBPM+USG%TS%AST%AST/TOCTOV%FTR3PRUA RIMRIM AST
'25ATL
7.897
+6.9
31.8%96
64.2%91
31.4%82
3.8
8.2%78
58.4%94
0.316.11.4
SHOOTING STATS (per 100 poss)
YEAREFG%RIMRIM%MIDMID%RIM/MID3PA3P%FTAFT%
'25ATL
58.4%88
9.276
70.1%94
8.488
51.2%96
1.09
7.162
38.2%67
9.891
87.4%82
DEFENSIVE STATS
YEARDBPMDBPM+STL%BLK%ORB%DRB%FC/40STK/FOUL
'25ATL
1.874
+0.6
2.8%88
1.4%44
2.1%38
18.4%62
1.882
1.4
PERCENTILE RANK VS NBA PLAYERS AT POSITION
STRENGTHS_WEAKNESSES
STRENGTHS_6
TS%
64.2%91 pctl
OBPM
+7.897 pctl
USG%
31.8%96 pctl
FTR
58.4%94 pctl
MID FG%
51.2%96 pctl
BPM
+8.498 pctl
WEAKNESSES_4
ORB%
2.1%38 pctl
BLK%
1.4%44 pctl
REBOUNDING
62guard avg
SPACING PROXY
62avg
+18 MORE ↓

GAME LOG

GAME LOG

2024–25 · ATL
DATEOPPMINUSGTS%PTS · REBAST · TOVSTL · BLKFG3PFTGmSc
May 2MEM3438%68%38 · 68 · 22 · 014-22 (64%)3-7 (43%)7-8 (88%)32.4
Apr 30DAL3635%62%31 · 47 · 11 · 111-19 (58%)2-5 (40%)7-8 (88%)27.1
Apr 28LAL3542%72%40 · 59 · 23 · 013-21 (62%)4-8 (50%)10-11 (91%)36.8
Apr 26GSW3736%54%28 · 75 · 31 · 010-22 (45%)1-6 (17%)7-9 (78%)21.2
Apr 24PHX3338%70%35 · 48 · 12 · 112-18 (67%)3-6 (50%)8-9 (89%)31.4
Apr 22MIN3434%61%29 · 67 · 21 · 010-18 (56%)2-5 (40%)7-8 (88%)25.8
Apr 20DEN3840%58%33 · 56 · 32 · 011-24 (46%)2-7 (29%)9-10 (90%)26.1
Apr 18SAC3244%74%42 · 410 · 13 · 114-20 (70%)5-9 (56%)9-10 (90%)38.9
Apr 16POR3032%64%26 · 87 · 21 · 09-16 (56%)2-4 (50%)6-7 (86%)24.2
Apr 14UTA3338%68%37 · 59 · 12 · 013-21 (62%)3-7 (43%)8-9 (89%)33.1
SOURCE: BASKETBALL-REFERENCEGAMES: 76   AVG GmSc: 28.4

ROLLING

ROLLING AVERAGES

5-game weighted average
ROLLING AVERAGES5-game weighted average
STAT 1
STAT 2
35 GAMES[2025]

SHOT PROFILE

SHOT PROFILE

Per 100 possessions
USG%
31.8%96
TS%
64.2%91
FREE THROW RATE
58.494
NET RATING
+13.297
RIM
70.1%94
9.2 ATT · 76th pctl
78% UNASSISTED22% AST
MID-RANGE
51.2%96
8.4 ATT · 88th pctl
91% UNASSISTED9% AST
ABOVE BREAK 3
38.2%67
7.1 ATT · 62nd pctl
68% UNASSISTED32% AST
FREE THROWS
87.4%82
9.8 ATT · 91st pctl

SCOUTING

SCOUTING REPORT · FULL ANALYSIS

Long-form evaluation · updated for current NBA sample
SYSTEM_ANALYSIS

Model blends tracking-informed efficiency, self-creation workload, and matchup-adjusted defensive indicators. Signal confidence rises with minutes stability and shot-profile volatility compression across rolling windows.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Trae Young profiles as a primary offensive engine: elite scoring gravity at all three levels, elite foul-drawing indicators, and table-setting reads that keep defenses tilted. The statistical footprint skews toward high-minute, high-usage perimeter dominance rather than pure connector play.

OFFENSIVE EVALUATION

Half-court shot-making sits in elite tiers with rim-plus-mid efficiency that unlocks late-clock mismatch hunting. Transition possessions trend efficient when lanes clear; half-court usage concentrates advantages without collapsing team spacing when shooters orbit above the break. Assist burden tracks primary-initiator expectations with manageable turnover tradeoffs given usage.

DEFENSIVE EVALUATION

Point-of-attack disruption flashes via hands activity and positioning discipline while conceding size-based disadvantages on the glass. Scheme versatility skews toward aggressive shifts when length trails screens; recovery athleticism props up weak-side rotations against secondary drivers.

NBA PROJECTION

Floor outcome assumes sustained availability and stable spacing ecosystem — peak outcomes align with MVP-tier offensive portability when playoff defenses tilt coverage resources away from teammates.

CONTEXT NOTE: Percentiles and prose synthesis mirror DraftBallr-style scouting flows — descriptive signals only, not a forecast of awards outcomes or injury risk.